The Impact of Globalization on the Institution of the Welfare State: Destruction or Modernization?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2524-2679-2019-02-108-117

Keywords:

welfare state, globalization, social policy, inequality

Abstract

The peculiarities of functioning of the social state institute in the conditions of globalization are investigated. Three scenarios of the impact of globalization on the welfare state are analyzed: negative, skeptical and positive. It is noted that the negative scenario links the link between globalization and the decline of welfare states; this link is defined as destructive because national states lose autonomy over social security policies. The skeptical scenario argues for the insignificant impact of economic globalization on the welfare state, as well as preserving the capacity of nation-states for social policy autonomy. The positive scenario has the least support in political science discourse; it assumes that globalization and the welfare state are compatible and mutually reinforcing. The article states that there is no stable scientific consensus on determining the content, boundaries, consequences of the impact of globalization on the welfare state. Proved working hypotheses: 1) economic globalization in its neo-liberal form, despite its obvious advantages, provokes excessive differentiation of income, migration flows, promotes technological unemployment, etc.; 2) the institute of the welfare state, within its current models, is not able to respond adequately to them, and therefore there is a prospect of updating national models of social policy. It is emphasized that globalization is affecting the institution of the welfare state not in a single scenario in different countries. It is suggested that the level of influence of globalization on the welfare state depends on the model of the welfare state; in particular, it is the strongest in the welfare state of the social-democratic model. It is emphasized that the extent of the impact of globalization on the welfare state is still dependent on the position of the nation-states themselves, first ‒ their willingness to reform national social security systems towards the introduction of systems of active social protection (stimulating human activity in the labor market, limiting passive spending, etc.).

References

Badyda, A. Yu. (2017). Sotsialna derzhava v umovakh hlobalizatsii: teoretychni ta porivnialno-pravovi aspekty: avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. n: 12.00.01. Lviv: Lvivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni Ivana Franka, 20 s.

Holovashchenko, O. S. (2016). Sotsialna derzhava ta vyklyky hlobalizatsii. Derzhavne budivnytstvo ta mistseve samovriaduvannia, № 32, S. 3‒11.

Kresina, I., Khoma, N. (2015). Modeli sotsialnoi derzhavy: modernizuiuchyi vplyv hlobalizatsii. Publichne pravo, № 1 (17), S. 185‒196.

Spiridonova, N. V. (2017). Vlijanie globalizacii na formirovanie modelej social'noj politiki. Problemy sovremennoj jekonomiki, № 2, S. 70‒75.

Khoma, N. M. (2012). Modeli sotsialnoi derzhavy: svitovyi ta ukrainskyi dosvid. Kyiv: Yurydychna dumka, 592 s.

Atkinson, A. (2002). Globalisation and the European welfare state at the opening and the closing of the twentieth century. H. Kierzkowski (Ed.), Europe and Globalisation. New York: Palgrave‐MacMillan, P. 249‒273.

Berger, S. (2002). Globalisation and politics. Annual Review of Political Science, № 3, P. 43‒62.

Bergh, A., Nilsson, T. (2010). Do liberalization and globalisation increase income inequality? European Journal of Political Economy, № 26 (4), P. 488‒505.

Bergh, A., Nilsson, T. (2010). Good for living? On the relationship between globalization and life expectancy. World Development, № 38 (9), P. 1191‒1203.

Brady, D., Beckfield, J., Seeleib‐Kaiser, M. (2005). Economic globalisation and the welfare state in affluent democracies, 1975–2001. American Sociological Review, № 70, P. 921‒948.

Burgoon, B. (2001). Globalisation and welfare compensation: Disentangling the ties that bind. International Organization, № 55, P. 509‒551.

Castles, F. G. (2004). The Future of the Welfare State: Crisis Myths and Crisis Realities. Oxford University Press.

Dorn, F., Fuest, C., Potrafke, N. (2018). Globalisation and Income Inequality Revisited. CESifo Working Paper, № 6859.

Dorn, F., Schinke, C. (2018). Top income shares in OECD Countries: the role of government ideology and globalization. World Economy, № 41 (9), Р. 2491‒2527.

Garrett, G. (1998). Global markets and national politics: Collision course or virtuous circle? International Organization, № 52, Р. 787‒824.

Garrett, G., Mitchell, D. (2001). Globalisation, government spending and taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research, № 39, Р. 145‒177.

Genschel, P. (2004). Globalisation and the welfare state: A retrospective. Journal of European Public Policy, № 11, P. 613‒636.

Gozgor, G., Ranjan, P. (2017). Globalisation, inequality, and redistribution: Theory and evidence. World Economy, № 40 (12), P. 2704‒2751.

Hardt, M., Negri, A. (2001). Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 496 p.

Hicks, A. (1999). Social Democracy and Welfare Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University, 256 p.

Huber, E., Stephens, J. (2001). Development and Crisis of the Welfare State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kim, T. K., Zurlo, K. (2009). How does economic globalisation affect the welfare state? Focusing on the mediating effect of welfare regimes. Int J Soc Welfare, № 18 (2), P. 130‒141.

Kittel, B., Winner, H. (2005). How reliable is pooled analysis in political economy? The globalization – welfare state nexus revisited. European Journal of Political Research, № 44, P. 269‒293.

Korpi, W. (2003). Welfare-state regress in Western Europe: Politics, institutions, globalisation and Europeanization. Annual Review of Sociology, № 29, Р. 589‒609.

Lang, V., Tavares, M. The distribution of gains from globalization. IMF Working Paper, № 18/54.

Milner, H. V. (2019). Globalisation, populism and the decline of the welfare state. URL: https://www.iiss.org/blogs/survival-blog/2019/02/globalisation-populism-and-the-decline-of-thewelfare-state

Pierson, P. (2001). The New Politics of the Welfare State. New York: Oxford University Press.

Potrafke, N. (2018). The globalization ‒ welfare state nexus Evidence from Asia. URL: https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/wp-2018-272-potrafke-welfare-asia.pdf

Razin, A. Welfare state Vs Market forces in a globalization era. URL: https://graduateinstitute.ch/communications/events/welfare-state-vs-market-forces-globalization-era

Rieger, E., Leibfried, S. (2003). Limits to Globalisation: Welfare States and the World Economy. Malden: Polity Press, 416 p.

Rodrik, D. (1997). Sense and nonsense in the globalisation debate. Foreign Policy, № 107, P. 19‒37.

Samuelson, R. J. (2019). The indestructible welfare state. The Washington Post, 31 Jul.

Scharpf, F. W. (1991). Crisis and choice in European social democracy. Cornell University Press, 303 p.

Schwartz, H. (2001). Round up the usual suspects! Globalisation, domestic politics, and welfare state change. P Pierson (Ed.), New Politics of the Welfare State. New York: Oxford University Press, 303 p.

Wade, R. (1996). Globalisation and its limits: Reports of the death of the national economy are greatly exaggerated. S. Berger, R. Dore (Еds.), National Diversity and Global Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 387 p.

Published

2019-10-31