COMMUNICATION FACTORS OF BELARUSIAN PROTESTS 2020

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2524-2679-2020-02-83-99

Keywords:

protests, Belarus, communications, Telegram

Abstract

This article confirms the findings of a number of previous studies that under authoritarian regimes, social protests begin with a combination of two main factors: increased restrictions on political rights and civil liberties and the widespread use of a (new) media channel beyond the control of the authorities. This assumption is confirmed by the example of the situation around the presidential elections in the Republic of Belarus in 2020.

The article compares the conditions and factors of mass protests in Belarus, North Africa and the Middle East and in Ukraine. It was established that before the elections in Belarus there were sufficient conditions and factors for the start of mass protests and they were involved.

We have shown that the new and uncontrolled by the Belarusian authorities channel became the Telegram messenger, which began to be widely used during the election period. The peculiarity of this communication channel is its confidentiality and anonymity of subscribers, as well as the narrow thematic focus of individual channels. We also analyzed Telegram as a means of political communication in authoritarian regimes, showed its differences as a means of communication from popular social networks, which were widely used to coordinate protests in the past.

We present the results of the analysis of the pre-election communication against the incumbent President of Belarus, which is based on the use of Telegram to spread the thesis of his “low rating”. It is shown that this thesis was generated with the participation of Russian big data analytical institutions and is largely disseminated by pro-Russian Telegram channels in Belarus. After the election, it became the basis for mass street protests and strikes in Belarus. The direct participation of professional political technologists in the management of Telegram-channels with anti-presidential content and their participation in the organization of the influence of pro-Russian and Russian channels in Belarus has also been established.

As a result, the probability of implementing a model of strategic communications in Belarus with elements of external influence on the course of the election campaign, which can be used to influence the leader of an authoritarian state, is confirmed.

References

Allied Joint Doctrine for Psychological Operations: Allied Joint Publication-3.10.1, NATO Standartization Office, 2014.

Rød, Espen Geelmuyden (2019), Fraud, grievances, and post-election protests in competitive authoritarian regimes, Electoral Studies, Volume 58, 2019, Pages 12-20.

Ash, Konstantin (2011), A game-theoretic model for protest in the context of post-communism, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Volume 44, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-15.

Way, Lucan A.; Levitsky, Steven (2006), The dynamics of autocratic coercion after the Cold War, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Volume 39, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 387-410.

Attia, Ashraf M.; Aziz, Nergis; Friedman, Barry; Elhusseiny, Mahdy F. (2011), Commentary: The impact of social networking tools on political change in Egypt’s “Revolution 2.0”, Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Volume 10, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 369-374.

Fedoniuk Sergii (2018). Mass Collaboration as a Factor of the Ukrainian Revolution 2013-2014. Language – Culture – Politics: International Journal. Vol. 1/2018, Pages 209-218.

Fedoniuk Sergii (2017). Factors of Public Information Collaboration in the Ukrainian "Revolution of Dignity" in Comparison with the Preconditions of the "Arab Spring", [in:] Tomasz Stempniewski, Andrzej Szabaciuk (ed.), Ukrainskij vopros: bezopasnost', jekonomika, obshhestvo, Ljublin, Izdatel'stvo Ljublinskogo Katolicheskogo Universiteta Ioanna Pavla II, 2017, Pages. 171-185. (In Russian)

Fedoniuk S. V. (2018) Open cooperation as a factor of social progress, Naukovyi visnyk Skhidnoievropeiskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Lesi Ukrainky. Seriia : Mizhnarodni vidnosyny, Lutsk, Skhidnoievrop. nats. un-t im. Lesi Ukrainky, 2018, № 1 (374), Pages. 91–96. (In Ukrainian)

Freedom on the Net 2016/2020. URL.: https://freedomhouse.org/country/belarus/freedom-net/2016(2020)

Kirillov A. G. (2017) Transforming the Blog Genre in Instant Messaging, Zhanry rechi, 2017, № 2 (16), Pages. 260–267. (In Russian)

Freedom on the Net 2017, https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-net/freedom-net-2017.

Kirillov Andrej (2018), Telegram channels as the latest transformation of social media under authoritarian regimes, Sovremennyj diskurs-analiz, Tom 20, Vyp. 1. URL.: http://www.discourseanalysis.org/ada20_1/st150.shtml. (In Russian)

Dorohin V.N. (2019) The phenomenon of political telegram channels as innovative digital media in Russia, Vestnik vgu. serija: filologija, zhurnalistika, 2019, № 1. URL.: http://www.vestnik.vsu.ru/pdf/phylolog/2019/01/2019-01-23.pdf. (In Russian)

Stepanov Vladimir (2018), Telegram messenger in the information space of Belarus, Multimedia journalism: collection of articles. scientific. tr. Int. scientific-practical Conf., Minsk, March 1–2, 2018, BGU, Institut zhurnalistiki, kaf. medialogii i veb-zhurnalistiki; pod obshh. red. V. P. Vorob'eva, Minsk, Izd. centr BGU, 2018, Pages. 240-245. URL.: http://socmedia.by/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Stepanov_Telegram.pdf. (In Russian)

Boguslavskaja Aleksandra. Why is Lukashenka annoyed by Telegram channels? URL.: https://www.dw.com/ru/почему-лукашенко-раздражают-telegram-каналы/a-53282297. (In Russian)

URL.: https://twitter.com/durov/status/129291275623304064?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1292912756233048064%7Ctwgr%5Eshare_3&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2F42.tut.by%2F696203.

Babaryka, Tikhanovsky, Lukashenko - polls on the Internet show unexpected results, Nasha Nіva, 20.05.2020. URL.: https://nn.by/?c=ar&i=252113. (In Belarusian)

In Minsk, 20 people were detained in a queue at a store selling Psycho3% T-shirts. Police say it's because of a "fight", Nastojashhee vremja, 24.06.2020. URL.: https://www.currenttime.tv/a/belarus-lukashenko-detention/30687005.html. (In Russian)

"Sasha 3%". Lukashenka reacts to the meme about his rating and claims that he has more, Nastojashhee vremja 24.06.2020. URL.: https://www.currenttime.tv/a/lukashenko-sasha-tri-procenta/30688502.html. (In Russian)

Lukashenka's rating calculated, Lenta.RU, 20.06.2020. URL.: https://lenta.ru/news/2020/06/20/malovato. (In Russian)

Research and analytics program for small and medium businesses. URL.: https://vk.com/away.php?to=https%3A%2F%2Ftazeros.com%2Fru%2Fprogramma_issledovanij_i_analitiki_dlya_malogo_i_srednego_biznesa&post=-56068194_350&el=snippet. (In Russian)

The maximum amount of compromising material at all. The Scientific Center under the Presidential Administration sells services that allow deanonymizing any resident of Russia. Meduza's investigation. URL.: https://meduza.io/feature/2019/08/08/maksimalnoe-kolichestvo-kompromata-na-vseh. (In Russian)

Kremlin prepares the ground for non-recognition of Lukashenko's "elegant victory" - media, UDF.BY. URL.: https://udf.by/news/main_news/215013-kreml-gotovit-pochvu-k-nepriznaniju-jelegantnoj-pobedy-lukashenko-smi.html. (In Russian)

Elections in the republic of Belarus 2020. URL.: https://tazeros.com/dashboard/6390a36a-d33c-4e18-9b84-ca0f7b2aa854. (In Russian)

URL.: https://ua.youtubers.me/denix-info/youtuber-stats.

URL.: https://by.tgstat.com/channel/@BeloRussica.

Shklyarov, a political strategist detained in Belarus, presumably prepared "partners" for the Russian opposition, Federal'noe agentstvo novostej, 31.07.2020, https://social.riafan.ru/1298139-zaderzhannyi-v-belorussii-polittekhnolog-shklyarov-predpolozhitelno-gotovil-partnerov-rossiiskoi-oppozicii. (In Russian)

URL.: https://echo.msk.ru/blog/shklyarov_v/2664299-echo.

Petrovich Inna (2019), Forbes Russia and Armanzhan Baitasov: how a Kazakh controls the ratings of the richest Russians. URL.: https://wowinfo.life/kazakhstan/forbes-rossija-i-armanzhan-bajtasov-kak-kazah-kontroliruet-rejtingi-bogatejshih-rossijan. (In Russian)

Skorbilin Denis (2019), About the "Nezygar" phenomenon and why Telegrams are not sent to Ukrainians?, NEWSSKY.COM.UA. URL.: https://newssky.com.ua/o-fenomene-nezygarya-i-pochemu-ukraintsam-ne-shlyut-telegram-y/. (In Russian)

Who is Nezygar? URL.: http://kashin.guru/2017/06/28/kto-nezygar/. (In Russian)

Published

2020-11-26