MODERN ASPECT OF UKRAINIAN POPULISM: POLITICAL AND SOCIAL ASPECT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2524-2679-2021-01-300-311

Keywords:

populism, election, political leader, political regime, democracy

Abstract

The study of populism is actualized by the presence of a social order from interested political actors who use populism to implement their programs and in the struggle for power, focusing on the possibilities of change and reform.             The relevance of the study is obvious given the lack of comprehensive study of populism in Ukraine, proper political evaluation of previous studies, rethinking some theses of individual researchers, and especially in connection with its actualization as one of the popular principles in action, behavior in modern political practice and our state.             Today in Ukraine, the intensification and emergence of new manifestations of populism have become a sign of a general long-term failure on the path of technological modernization, in efforts to achieve rapid economic growth and in the fight against corruption. The tendency to the increasingly negative attitude of many citizens to complex and compromise procedures of democratic institutions, the desire for quick and simple solutions, intolerance of different views contain a double threat - to roll into anarchy or establish an authoritarian regime.             In Ukrainian literature interest in populism appeared in the late 1990s. The initial study was the basis of his reception of analytical findings Western scholars. Today domestic historiography populism presented a number of papers in the form of articles. Amid the general characteristics of the phenomenon of populism, based primarily on the legacy of Western political scientists, highlights particular issues such as manifestations of populism in the Ukrainian national movement, modern Ukrainian politics populist methods of political struggle, philosophical discourse of the concept.             Thus, populism can be considered an inevitable companion of political freedom and democracy. In some places, it is a force that promotes political participation and reform in the interests of many low-status social groups. By inclining to oppose the rights of the majority to the interests and rights of certain minorities, populism can be a threat to the rule of law and basic political and civil liberties. Wherever populist leaders gained power, it became authoritarian, accompanied by abuses and oppression (but not destruction) of the opposition.

References

Analitychnyi zvit. Otsiniuvannia rivnia populizmu na parlamentskykh vyborakh 2014 r. / HO «Biuro analityky Tektum». URL: http://www.tectum.org.ua/proekt-realizovuvavsia-za-pidtrymky-m/

Illiashenko P., Mykhailynyna D., Yablonskyi D. Yak zrobyty ukraintsiv mensh vrazlyvymy do populizmu. https://ces.org.ua/populism-paper/2019

Kiyanka I. Populizm u prohramakh politychnykh partii v konteksti derzhavnoho upravlinnia: dosvid krain Tsentralno-Skhidnoi Yevropy // Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho universytetu. Seriia: Politolohiia. Sotsiolohiia. Filosofiia. Uzhhorod, 2015. Vyp. 1 (18). S. 92–95.

Kramar O. Rozimknute kolo, shcho robyt Ukrainu vidstaloiu / O. Kramar https://tyzhden.ua/Economics/233973№ 33 (613) vid 15 serpnia

Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C., 1985. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London, Verso.

Lisnychuk O. Populizm v Ukraini: teoretychni zasady i problemy vyvchennia fenomenu.// Naukovi zapysky Instytutu politychnykh i etnonatsionalnykh doslidzhen im. I.F. Kurasa NAN Ukrainy. 2015. S.63-73

Lytvyn V. Teoretychni osoblyvosti, instytutsiini ryzyky ta pozytyvy zbalansovanoho napivprezydentalizmu y perspektyvy yoho reformuvannia v Ukraini // Studia politologica Ucraino-Polonia. 2015. Vyp. 5. S. 45–54. URL: http://nbuv. gov.ua/UJRN/Spup_2015_5_6 (data zvernennia: 04.07.2016).

Liutyi T. Populizm i kryza intelektualiv. https://hromadske.ua/posts/populizm-i-kriza-intelektualiv 2019

Perspektyvy livoi ideolohii v umovakh sotsialnykh transformatsii (Iak ukrainski livi vidpovidaiut na vyklyky suchasnosti?): materialy konf. / Sotsiolohichna konsultatsiia Ukrainy; In-t sotsiolohii NAN Ukrainy / [za red. M. O. Shulhy]. Kyiv: In-t sotsiolohii NAN Ukrainy, 2003. 234 s.

Petrashchuk A. O. Razvytye stratehyy Ukraynы v otnoshenyy SNH za peryod 2010 – 2017 hh. // STUDIA POLITOLOGICZNE. Polytycheskye protsessы v stranakh Vostochnoi Evropы. Tendentsyy y problemы. Universytet Warszawski. – vol.48. – 2019 . – s.161 – 173.

Robinson, James A, and Daron Acemoglu. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 2006

Wasilewski Kr. Hate speech and identity politics. An intercultural communication perspective. // Przeglad Europejski. Theoretical reflection on the activity of entities at international, regional and national levels. Warszawa. 2019 – 3. PP. 175- 189.

Zachara M. Can Institutions Save the Word? Neoliberal Institutionalist Perspective on Global Governance. // International Relations. Universytet Warszawski. Nr.1. Tom 55. – 2019 – SS. 41-59.

Published

2021-02-09