FEATURES OF WORLD POLICY IN NUCLEAR MISSILE WEAPONS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2524-2679-2021-03-225-235

Keywords:

nuclear missile programs, international security, nuclear nonproliferation, arms race

Abstract

The article describes the main trends in world politics in nuclear missile weapons in the field of international and national security, assesses the importance of nuclear missile programs in modern international political security relations. It has been proved that the states that implement nuclear missile programs pursue this policy in two directions: preparation and implementation of nuclear missile programs in order to establish political control and prevent violation of the nuclear missile balance in the world and development of nuclear missile programs in order to implement the function ensuring national security and obtaining political autonomy in international relations. It is shown that political institutions to curb the proliferation of nuclear missiles in modern international relations are designed to ensure the continuity of the arms reduction process in the context of the obvious change in the paradigm of international relations and the prospects for political polarization of the world order.

References

Soboliev A.A. (2013) Stratehichni nastupalni ozbroiennia: chynnyk strymuvannia chy heopolitychnoho vplyvu? Stratehichni priorytety. [in Ukrainian].

Kononov L.A. (2011) Osnovy jadernoj geopolitiki: stanovlenie nauchnogo napravlenija: monografija. [in Russian].

Antonov A.I. (2004) DNJaO i koncepcija NATO po «sovmestnomu upravleniju» jadernym oruzhiem. Jadernyj kontrol. [in Russian].

Veselov V.A. (2010) Jadernyj faktor v mirovoj politike: struktura i soderzhanieVestn. Mosk. un-ta. Ser. 25. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija i mirovaja politika. [in Russian].

Zaloga S. (2002) The Kremlin’s Nuclear Sword: the Rise and Fall of Russia’s Strategic Nuclear Forces, 1945–2000. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press. [in English].

Problemy yadernoi bezpeky suchasnoho svitu i Ukraina: zbirnyk naukovykh prats / Za zahalnoiu redaktsiieiu doktora istorychnykh nauk, profesora Kudriachenka A.I.; DU «Instytut vsesvitnoi istorii NAN Ukrainy» K.: Derzhavna ustanova «Instytut vsesvitnoi istorii NAN Ukrainy», 2016. [in Ukrainian].

Antonov A.I. (2009) Mnogostoronnie podhody k jadernomu razoruzheniju: planiruja sledujushhie shagi. Indeks bezopasnosti. [in Russian].

Radzhabli A.A. (2010) Problemy sovremennoj mezhdunarodnoj politiki v sfere global'noj bezopasnosti. Sistema cennostej sovremennogo obshhestva. [in Russian].

Smith B. (2003) International Security and Peace. Wash., University Press. [in English]

Radzhabli A.A. (2004) Nacional'nye interesy i mezhdunarodnaja bezopasnost' (analiz vneshnepoliticheskogo povedenija). Baku: BSU. [in Russian].

Popovych O.I. (2008) Stanovlennia i rozvytok system protyraketnoi oborony SShA i SRSR na pochatku druhoi polovyny ХХ stolittia. Viiskovo-naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho instytutu Sukhoputnykh viisk Natsionalnoho universytetu “Lvivska politekhnika”. [in Ukrainian].

Rogov S.M. (1999) Protivoraketnyj vyzov Vashingtona. Nezavisimoe voennoe obozrenie. [in Russian].

Malygina A.A. (2005) Jadernoe oruzhie kak faktor mirovoj politiki: globalizacija ili deglobalizacija? Uchenye zapiski. Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija. Istoricheskie, teoreticheskie i regional'nye aspekty. Obshhestvo «Znanie» Sankt-Peterburga i Leningradskoj oblasti. SPb. [in Russian].

Published

2021-10-27