RUSSIAN-GEORGIAN TRADE WARS AS A MEANS OF POLITICAL PRESSURE ON RUSSIA

Authors

  • Serhij Kulyk Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University
  • Аnna Vasylchuk Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2524-2679-2023-03-339-353

Keywords:

Russian-Georgian war of 2008, Abkhazia and the South Ossetia, trade war, bottled wine, economic sanctions, GDP

Abstract

The article defines the concept of «trade war», and considers the reasons, forms and methods of their conduct. Author analyses the publications of domestic and foreign scientists on this issue. Trade wars initiated by the Russian Federation against Georgia are analyzed in chronological order. It has been clarified why these groups of goods of Georgian export, manufacturers, were chosen as the ob- ject. It gad been found which governmental structures of the Russian Federation were directly involved in this war as well as their role in its deployment. With the help of statistical data, it is specified what damages were caused to Sakartvelo’s economy and its international image, and how it affected public sentiment. At- tention is drawn to the reaction of the official authorities of the world’s leading states, as well as Ukraine, to this conflict. The statements, positions and proposed measures of individual presidents were reviewed. Article goes on to covers the concrete steps that were taken to resolve the contradictions between the partici- pants in the conflict. It was concluded that, despite the negative consequences for the economy of both countries, the Kremlin authorities deliberately and arti- ficially create these trade wars. Since then, it has destabilizes Georgia’s domestic political situation, created an economic and worsened the popularity of its well- known trademarks among international partners and professional organizations. In conclusion, this is a continuation of the aggressive foreign policy of the presi- dent of Russian President V. Putin by means of economic pressure and blackmail.

References

Serpukhov, M. Yu. (2013). Obgruntuvannia interesiv uchasnykiv torhivelnykh viin v mizhnarodnii ekonomitsi. Ekonomika rozvytku, № 3 (67), p. 106–110.

Hordieieva, T. (2013). Mizhnarodni torhovelni superechky u suchasnii rehuliatyvnii paradyhmi. Mizhnarodna ekonomichna polityka, № 2 (19), p. 101–125.

Kyrydon, A. M. Prychyny rosiisko-hruzynskoho konfliktu 2008 roku: hlobalnyi vymir. URL: http://vmv.kymu.edu.ua/series/vmv/vipusk7/3.pdf.

Habro, I., Kurilenko, A. (2021). Istorychni peredumovy ta prychyny rosiisko-hru- zynskoi viiny 2008 roku. Starozhytnosti Lukomoria, № 3 (6). URL: http:/www.lukomor. mosk.mksat.net/index.php/lukomor/article/view/83/75.

Dzhuda, B. (2015). Krykhka imperiia: Yak Rosiia poliubyla i rozliubyla Vladimira Putina. Kyiv: Meduza, 416 c.

Artymyshyn, P. (2018). Rosiisko-hruzynskyi konflikt 2008 r. u mediinomu dyskursi Ukrainy. Ukraina XX stolittia: kultura, ideolohiia, polityka: zb. statei. Kyiv, vyp. 23, p. 262–280.

Yaroshenko, Ye. Viina v Hruzii: chotyry vazhlyvykh uroky dlia Ukrainy. URL: https://apostrophe.ua/ua/ article/politics/2017-08-08/voyna-rossii-s-gruziey-chetyire-vajny- ih-uroka-dlya-ukrainyi/13777.

Yatsenko, O. M., Uskova, D. S. (2019). Suchasni determinanty ta formy mizhn- arodnykh torhovelnykh superechok. Mizhnarodni ekonomichni vidnosyny ta svitove hospo- darstvo, № 28 (2), p. 173–176.

Kaliuzhna, N. (2019). Determinanty zovnishnotorhovelnykh konfliktiv. Zovnishnia torhivlia: ekonomika, finansy, pravo, № 2, p. 36–46.

Torhovelni viiny suchasnosti ta yikh vplyv na ekonomichne zrostannia i rozvytok u sviti ta Ukraini / Nauk. red. V. Yurchyshyn. Kyiv: Zapovit, 2019, 190 p.

WTO Dispute Settlement: One-Page Case Summaries 1995–2018. URL: https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/dispu_settl_1995_2018_e.pdf.

Bush: Suverenitet i terytorialnu tsilisnist Hruzii nalezhyt povazhaty. URL: https:// www.radiosvoboda.org/a/1190861.html.

Konspekt lektsii z dystsypliny «Zovnishnia polityka krain SND» / ukladaczi: Chis- tiakova, I. M., Bilousov, O. S., Kudlai, I. V., Babina, V. O., Moiseieva, T. M., Latysheva, V.

V. Odesa: DU «Odeska politekhnika». 2021, 219 p.

Georgia: the Split that Split the SCO. URL: https://web.archive.org/ web/20080912175233/http://www.cacianalyst.org/?q=node%2F4930.

Natsionalne statystychne upravlinnia Hruzii. Zovnishnia torhivlia tovaramy. URL: https://www.geostat.ge/.

Federal'naja sluzhba gosudarstvennoj statistiki. Vneshnjaja torgovlja. https://ros- stat.gov.ru/statistics/vneshnyaya_torgovlya.

Ministerstvo okhorony navkolyshnoho seredovyshcha ta silskoho hospodarstva Hruzii. Analityka. URL: https://mepa.gov.ge/Ge/Page/Analysis.

World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files. Im- ports of goods and services. URL: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.IMP.GNFS. CN?locations=RU&view=chart.

Ob’em importa Rossii po stranam i kategorijam. Ob'em importa Rossii po stranam i kategorijam. URL: https://take-profit.org/statistics/imports/russia/.

UNECE. Valovyj vnutrennij produkt (VVP). URL: https://w3.unece.org/PXWeb/ ru/Table?IndicatorCode=12.

Trade Map. Bilateral trade between Georgia and Russian Federation. URL: https:// www.trademap.org/Bilateral.aspx?nvpm=1%7c268%7c%7c643%7c%7cTOTAL%7c%7c%7c2%7c1%7c1%7c1%7c1%7c%7c1%7c1%7c%7c1.

Published

2023-09-28