USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TOOLS IN MODERN DIPLOMACY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29038/2524-2679-2025-01-94-115Keywords:
diplomacy, digital diplomacy, AI, GenAI, machine learning, crisis managementAbstract
The main purpose of the article is to study the application of artificial intel- ligence in diplomatic practice and its contribution to the improvement of this sphere.
The article analyzes the impact of AI on modern diplomacy. The technological transformation taking place in this area, the possibilities, conditions and means of using AI tools in modern diplomacy are considered. The benefits and risks of such use are highlighted, including those related to ethics and security in the digital environment. It was found that the implementation of AI in diplomatic activities requires an assessment of the institutional potential of the MFA, tak- ing into account the integration with new technologies, such as 3D printing and the IoT. Success depends on the ability to adapt to changes in the areas of digi- tal transformation, which requires the creation of conditions for further study of the potential of AI.
The study showed that the use of AI tools in modern diplomacy helps to auto- mate routine operations and improve service, reducing the cognitive load on people and facilitating interaction with applicants; helps overcome language barriers through contextual language translation, which improves the quality of communication between representatives of different countries; used for image recognition, information processing and combating disinformation, which in- creases the security of diplomatic missions; analyzes data and helps diplomats make decisions during negotiations, which facilitates the achievement of de- sired results; monitors open data for early detection of crisis situations, which allows for more effective management of potential conflicts.
The scientific novelty of the article lies in the study of the influence of AI tools, in particular GenAI, on diplomatic practice.
The paper has implications for diplomatic institutions and researchers as it of- fers recommendations for integrating AI into diplomatic processes and strate- gic planning.
References
1. Pouliot, V. & Cornut, J. (2015). Practice theory and the study of diplomacy: A re- search agenda. Cooperation and conflict, 50(3). 297–315. (in English).
2. OECD AI Principles overview. OECD.AI website. Retrieved from: https://oecd.ai/ en/ai-principles (in English).
3. Russell, S., Perset, K. & Grobelnik, M. (2023). Updates to the OECD’s definition of an AI system explained. OECD.AI website. Retrieved from: https://oecd.ai/en/wonk/ai- system-definition-update (in English).
4. What Is Generative AI? Definition, Applications, and Impact. COURSERA web- site. 24.07.2024. Retrieved from: https://www.coursera.org/articles/what-is-generative-ai. (in English).
5. Meskó, B. & Topol, E. J. (2023). The imperative for regulatory oversight of large language models (or generative AI) in healthcare. Digital Medicine, 6(1). Retrieved from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41746-023-00873-0 (in English).
6. Jo, A. (2023). The promise and peril of generative AI. Nature, 614(1). 214–216 (in English).
7. Alkaissi, H. & McFarlane, S. I. (2023). Artificial hallucinations in ChatGPT: impli- cations in scientific writing. Cureus, 15(2). Retrieved from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/36811129/ (in English). Krzyzanowski, M. (2020). Digital diplomacy or political communication? Ex- ploring social media in the EU institutions from a critical discourse perspective. Digital Diplomacy and International Organisations: Autonomy, Legitimacy and Contestation. London, England: Routledge. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publica- tion/343900331_Digital_Diplomacy_or_Political_Communication_Exploring_Social_ Media_in_The_EU_Institutions_from_a_Critical_Discourse_Perspective1 (in English).
8. Khan, M. L., Ittefaq, M., Pantoja, Y. I. M. & et al. (2021). Public Engagement Model to Analyze Digital Diplomacy on Twitter: A Social Media Analytics Framework. International Journal of Communication, 15, 1741–1769 (in English).
9. Konovalova, M. (2023). AI and Diplomacy: Challenges and Opportunities. Jour-
nal of Liberty and International Affairs, 9(2), 520–530. (in English).
10. Roumate, F. (2021). Artificial Intelligence and Digital Diplomacy. Challenges and Opportunities. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing (in English).
11. Stanzel, V. & Voelsen, D. (2022). Diplomacy and artificial intelligence: Reflec- tions on practical assistance for diplomatic negotiations. Berlin, German: SWP Research Paper. Retrieved from: https://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/research_ papers/2022RP01_Diplomacy_and_AI.pdf. (in English).
12. Calzada, I. (2023). Disruptive technologies for e-Diasporas: Blockchain, DAOs, data cooperatives, metaverse, and ChatGPT. Futures, 154, 103–258. (in English).
13. Horowitz, M. C., Scharre, P., Allen, G. C., Frederick, K., Cho, A. & Saravalle,
E. (2018). Artificial Intelligence and International Security. Center for New American Security (CNAS) website. Retrieved from: https://www.cnas.org/publications/reports/ artificial-intelligence-and-international-security (in English).
14. Scott, B., Heumann, S. & Lorenz, P. (2018). Artificial Intelligence and Foreign Policy. Stiftung Neue Veranwortung. Retrieved from: https://www.stiftung-nv.de/sites/de- fault/files/ai_foreign_policy.pdf (in English).
15. Mapping the Challenges and Opportunities of Artificial Intelligence for the Con- duct of Diplomacy. (2019). Diplo website. Retrieved from: https://www.diplomacy.edu/ sites/default/files/AI-diplo-report.pdf (in English).
16. Bjola, C. (2019). Diplomacy in the age of Artificial Intelligence. USC Centre on Public Diplomacy website. Retrieved from: https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/diploma- cy-age-artificial-intelligence (in English).
17. Grottola, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence and diplomacy: A new tool for dip- lomats? Dig.watch website. Retrieved from: https://dig.watch/resources/artificial-intelli- gence-and-diplomacy-new-tool-diplomats. (in English).
18. Hamidouche, K. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A New Tool for Dimplomats. Ar- tificial Intelligence and Digital Diplomacy. Challenges and Opportunities. Cham, Swit- zerland: Springer International Publishing. (in English).
19. Kļaviņš, D. (2021). Diplomacy and Artificial Intelligence in Global Political Competition. Competition in World Politics Knowledge, Strategies and Institutions. Biele- feld, Deutschland: Verlag (in English).
20. Ivasechko, O. Ia., & Kalyta, O. A. (2023). Shtuchnyi intelekt yak novitnii instru- ment dyplomatii: vyklyky ta perspektyvy [Artificial intelligence as a new tool of diplo- macy: challenges and prospects]. Rehionalni studii – Regional studios. DOI https://doi. org/10.32782/2663-6170/2023.34.22 (in Ukrainian).
21. Hachkevych, A., & Nykolyshyn, M. (2023). Dyplomatychnyi nabir instrumentiv shtuchnoho intelektu [Diplomatic AI Toolkit]. International Science Journal of Jurispru- dence & Philosophy, 2(3), 45–54. DOI: 10.46299/j.isjjp.20230203.03. (in Ukrainian).
22. Hachkevych, A. (2023). Vplyv shtuchnoho intelektu na dyplomatiiu YeS: mozh- lyvosti ta problem [The impact of artificial intelligence on EU diplomacy: opportunities and challenges]. U Novyi poriadok dennyi dlia Yevropy ta Yevropeiskoho Soiuzu: prychy- ny – napriamy – priorytetni tsili. Lviv, Ukraine: Publishing House of Lviv Polytechnic. Retrieved from: https://ena.lpnu.ua/items/9fcb2998-554e-401f-a8b4-a12684677474 (in Ukrainian).
23. Frey, C. (2024). Digital Diplomacy: The Impact of Technology on Modern Diplo- macy and Foreign Policy. Current Realities and Future Prospects. Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 24(1), 107–126 (in English).
24. Sevin, E., & Eken, M. E. (2024). Yet another turn? Priotising the needs of di- plomacy over the capabilities of generative AI. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-024-00325-w (in English).
25. Balashova, L. (2023). Dyplomatychnyi intelekt. MZS zapuskaie ShI-avatar Vik- toriia dlia ozvuchuvannia ofitsiinykh zaiav. Yak vidomstvo Kuleby khoche rozvorushyty konservatyvnu dyplomatiiu rozrobkoiu za $10 000 [Diplomatic intelligence. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs launches the AI avatar Victoria to voice official statements. How Kule- ba's department wants to shake up conservative diplomacy with development for $10,000]. Forbes Ukraine. Retrieved from: https://forbes.ua/innovations/diplomatichniy-intelekt- mzs-zapuskae-shi-avatar-viktoriya-dlya-ozvuchuvannya-ofitsiynikh-zayav-yak-vidomst- vo-kulebi-khoche-rozvorushiti-konservativnu-diplomatiyu-za-10-000-19042024-20628. (in Ukrainian).
26. Choi, E. C. (2019). Will algorithms make safe decisions in foreign affairs? Dip- lo Foundation. Retrieved from: https://www.diplomacy.edu/blog/will-algorithms-make- safe-decisions-foreign-affairs (in English).
27. Enterprise AI Strategy. Empowering Diplomacy through Responsible AI. (2023).
U.S. Department of State website. Retrieved from: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/ uploads/2023/11/Department-of-State-Enterprise-Artificial-Intelligence-Strategy.pdf (in English).
28. Franke, U. (2021). Artificial intelligence diplomacy. Artificial Intelligence gov- ernance as a new European Union external policy tool. European Parliament website. Retrieved from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2021/662926/ IPOL_STU(2021)662926_EN.pdf&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiEq8_voJOHAxVbBNsEHW Q3DCYQFnoECAMQAg&usg=AOvVaw3hWOoEmWQhfomAYSCKqP7G (in English).
29. Hardlington, L. Binder, J., Gardner, S., Karanika-Murray, M. & Knight, S. (2023). The use of artificial intelligence in a military context: development of the attitudes toward AI in defense (AAID) scale. Psychol, 14,1164810. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1164810. (in English).
30. Jafarova, L. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Digital Diplomacy. E-international relations website. Retrieved from: https://www.e-ir.info/2023/08/01/artificial-intelligence- and-digital-diplomacy/ (in English).
31. Bjola, C. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Diplomatic Crisis Management: Ad- dressing the ‘Fog of War’ Problem, Working Paper No 6. Oxford Digital Diplomacy Research Group website. Retrieved from: http://www.qeh.ox.ac.uk/sites/www.odid.ox.ac. uk/files/DigDiploROxWP6.pdf (in English).
32. Allen, G., & Chan, T. (2017). Artificial intelligence and national security. Harvard Kennedy School website. Retrieved from: https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/ files/publication/AI%20NatSec%20-%20final.pdf (in English).
33. Vacarelu, M. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: To Strengthen or to Replace Tradi- tional Diplomacy. Artificial Intelligence and Digital Diplomacy. Challenges and Opportu- nities. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing (in English).
34. Manor, I. (2017). The digitalization of diplomacy: Toward clarification of a frac- tured terminology (Working paper). Digdipblog.com website. Retrieved from: https:// digdipblog.files.wordpress.com/2017/08/the-digitalization-ofdiplomacy-working-paper- number-1.pdf (in English).
35. Zahid, F. B. (2023). Negotiating New Realities: Navigating the Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Diplomacy. BIPSS. Retrieved from: https://bipss.org. bd/pdf/Negotiating%20New%20Realities%20Navigating%20the%20Intersection.pdf (in English).
