POLITICAL EXAMINATION AS A VIEW OF PUBLIC CONTROL BY THE AUTHORITIES

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29038/2524-2679-2018-02-62-72

Keywords:

political expertise, civil control, public control, government bodies, civil society

Abstract

The urgency of the article is that even in democratic states there are frequent abuses of power, so the power process needs to be monitored, evaluated, controlled and constructively criticized. All of these functions are generally called in a democratic society by public control, one of the most important forms of which, in our opinion, is political examination.

The purpose of the article is to consider political examination as a form of public control over the activities of the authorities. The task of the article: to consider the concept of «public control» and «public control», to investigate the role of political expertise in the political and state process.

Who can control the organs of state power in a democratic state? First, they themselves. However, control of ourselves is not always objective. Secondly, public organizations, that is, civil society. The stronger the civil society, the more effective the public control. It is public control called for not to allow the authorities to deviate from the norms of law and the interests of society and the state.

Analysis of the content of the definition of public examination shows that, according to logic, decisions made by the executive authorities should be political decisions. After all, the definition of a socially significant problem is included in the technology of preparation and adoption of political decisions, as well as the choice of the best of them.

Public control is the monitoring and evaluation of the activities of public authorities by citizens and civil society organizations.

References

Marzak G. Public control as a form of interaction between civil society and the state. Izvestia MSTU «MAMI», No. 1 (19), 2014, Vol. 5, p. 200–201.

Logachev V. Constitutional and legal principles of public control during elections and referendums in Ukraine, author’s abstract, dis сand. legal sciences Kharkiv, 2016, 23 p. (in Ukrainian).

Zabralova O. Development of public control in the sphere of activity of the executive authorities of the Russian Federation, author. dis. сand. legal sciences. M., 2012, 26 p. (in Russian).

Zarichniy O. Participation of the public in the exercise of public authority: theoretical and legal research, author’s abstract. diс. cand legal sciences Lviv, 2017, 24 p. (in Ukrainian).

Klinshans E. Institute of Civil Control over the Penitentiary System in the context of political modernization of Russia, author. dis. cand. polit. sciences, Saratov, 2011, 20 p. (in Russian).

Schumpeter J. Capitalism. Socialism. Democracy. M.: Economics, 1995, 540 p. (in Russian).

Public examination: theoretical and practical aspects. K: Tetyukin, 2011, 120 p. (in Ukrainian).

Petrenko I. Expert and analytical support of state policy in Ukraine: the state and prospects of development, Vechiia Verkhovna Rada Magazine, 2011, No. 12, p. 12–16. (in Ukrainian).

Volynkina L. A. The role of political expertise in political decision-making, Proceedings of Saratov University. Vol. 10, Sociology Series. Political Science, Vol. 4, 2010, p. 88–91 (in Russian).

Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No. 976 «On Approval of the Procedure for Supporting the Public Examination of Activities of Executive Bodies». [Electronic resource]. Available at https://zakon. rada.gov.ua/laws/show/976-2008-%D0%BF (in Ukrainian).

The Government deepens communication with the public [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://ukurier.gov.ua/en/news/uryad-pogliblyuye-komunikaciyu-z-gromadskistyu/. (in Ukrainian).

«The use of the potential of non-governmental think tanks in shaping national security policy». [Electronic resource]. Available at: http://www.niss.gov. ua/articles/2119/ (in Ukrainian).

Stepanko O. Humanitarian expertise as a mechanism of public control and technology of modern communication. Theory and practice of public administration. Zb sciences Ave Kh.: View of KRI NAPA «Magister», 2014, Vip. 2 (45), p. 66–75 (in Ukrainian).

Vitvitsky S. Control as a guarantee of the legality of the activities of the public administration, author’s abstract. dis doc. Law of Sciences. Kharkiv, 2016, 39 p. (in Ukrainian).

Published

2018-10-25